Yoon Suk-yeol’s Downfall Should Spark Introspection on the US Approach to South Korea 

South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol’s short-lived martial law order on December 3 stunned the foreign policy establishment in Washington. While condemning Yoon’s subversion of South Korean democracy, many commentators also expressed concerns about losing South Korean support for the hardline posture the United States has adopted against North Korea and China.

With the National Assembly voting to impeach Yoon on December 14, U.S. analysts are worried that the president’s downfall will discredit right-wing politics and open the way for a quick return of a South Korean liberal president, who would be more dovish toward North Korea and China. Commentators warned of weakening military readiness against North Korea and regional alignment to counter China.

Indeed, in Washington, the South Korean liberal coalition is often considered an unreliable partner whose foreign policy orientation goes against U.S. interests. Reacting to the martial law fiasco and its likely precipitation of liberal rule in Seoul, one think tank expert lamented that South Korea’s Democratic Party “favors conciliatory policies toward North Korea and China while distancing South Korea from its alliance with the United States…its policies are not in alignment with U.S. strategic objectives.”

Far from an occasion for hand-wringing, however, the shocking developments in South Korea offer an opportunity for long-overdue self-reflection in Washington on the self-sabotaging nature of U.S. policy toward the Korean Peninsula.